Book review: Soumission

I've finished reading the controversial book of the moment, "Soumission" by Michel Houellebecq.

There has been so much said and written about it that the element of surprise has been completely irrelevant, but I read it out of interest because, since its publication, the media has been having a caca nerveux and throwing its toys out of the pram. The book satirises French society including politics and politicians, but gives special attention to l'Education National.

I have not read a Houellebecq book before, but, according to reviewers, the protagonist, François, is one of his typical cowardly, frustrated and miserable characters.

François is a university professor of letters who spends as little time as possible teaching but uses it to meet and shag a new student every year. He ages, his conquests don't. His only worry is whether, with advancing age, he'll still be able to 'pull'. We hear about his sexual exploits, and realise that they form his major interest in life, empty and superficial though they may be.

While François is examining his navel (and other body parts) and ruminating on the nineteenth century author Joris-Karl Huysmans known for his idiosyncratic use of French which Houellebecq seems to have been determined to exceed (although that may just be me and my less than perfect mastery of the language), Mohammad Ben Abbès becomes president of France. One of those "front républican" manipulations that the UMPS put on to block the Front National getting elected results in a series of arrangements that brings the Muslim party to power after two disastrous terms as president by François Hollande. We're talking 2022, in the not too distant future.

The new president is a highly sophisticated political animal. He knows that he would not be able to maintain power if he tried to go for a totalitarian state under Sharia law. Instead, he agrees to share a certain amount of power but insists on Islamic education throughout l'Education National. Most girls will be educated to primary level and then sent to institutes to teach them how to be good wives and mothers. When you have access to education, you control the future... The other non-negotiable point is the legalisation of polygamy. Polygamy is, however, only for the elite, for the benefit of natural selection...

After coming to power, Ben Abbès declares it illegal for women to work so they are sent home to live on generous benefits (financed by the Gulf). Unemployment immediately falls as men take up those positions liberated by women.

As a non-Muslim, François is retired on a healthy pension despite his age (45), and thus loses his access to students. Suddenly frustrated, he frequents certain websites, and is led by his willy to pay for even more empty and superficial sexual exploits.

Houllebecqu analyses, through him and his colleagues, the state of France and the French. Western civilisation is described as decadent and ageing, and in the process of committing suicide. There is a particularly spicy description of "islamogauchisme" that gave me a good laugh.

"Mais c'est surtout à ses confrères islamogauchistes qu'il réservait ses sarcasmes: l'islamogauchisme, écrivait-il, était une tentative désespérée de marxistes décomposés, pourrissants, en état de mort clinique, pour se hisser hors des poubelles de l'histoire en s'accrochant aux forces montantes de l'islam."

(But he reserved his sarcasm for his islamo-lefty colleagues: islamo-leftism, he wrote, was a desperate attempt of rotting, decomposed Marxists in a state of clinical death to haul themselves out of the rubbish bins of history by hanging on to the rising forces of Islam.)

They discuss the role of women, politicians (François Bayrou, the new prime minister, is described in scathing terms), families and the new policy of encouraging families to set up businesses instead of living off the state. From a top down society, it becomes, under Ben Abbès, active from the bottom up.

The most nauseous section is when François visits the house of a superior from his old university and bumps into a young girl of fifteen wearing a Hello Kitty tee shirt. She is unveiled so screams and runs off, and he is told she is one of wives of the crusty old colleague who is 60. Yuk. The status of women is reduced to either: mature housekeeper/cook, or pretty young "service station", the sex toy to be as young as possible. It's legal paedophilia.

There's another scene on a train when he's sitting near a rich Saudi type who has two young girls opposite him, obviously his wives. François starts comparing the lives of these Muslim Arab woman, with western women. Western women dress up to go to work. They do their job all day, and come home exhausted, then change out of their sexy smart clothes into comfy togs. Muslim women, on the other hand, are indistinguishable one from the other outside under their veils, but once home, change into sexy undies to serve as beautiful playthings to their lord and master. They are brought up to submit to his needs; their own, presumably, of no interest to anyone. 

Houllebecq is known to be a misogynist, probably because he has little, physically, to please the chicks...

see what I mean?

François contemplates a life as one of the favoured few with an important position at the university, and three pretty wives to wait on him hand and foot. Obviously, he's not interested in them as individuals but as providers of food and sex. His willy wins out, he submits to Islam, and the faint hope that he could learn to love... 

This is not an anti-Islamic book at all. In fact, I think that the author sees many advantages for the male sex in submitting to Mohammed. Rather than get all het up about the portrayal of France under Islam, the media would do better to examine some of the societal and political issues raised. It makes one think that the controversy around this book is nothing more than commercial manipulation. I believe it's selling like hot cakes...

Were such a situation to occur in France, it would set women's rights back a hundred years. With politicians and the justice system so craven towards Muslims these days, I am not confident that this will not happen.

It would just take a clever guy and some political manipulation backed by a lot of money. Can't you just see it?

What's Happening in France? In Other News...

Did you know that over half the bank notes seized by the police in France have traces of cocaine? This is money from all types of crime - from simple theft to sophisticated scams. It makes you wonder how much money in normal circulation is also tainted. Actually I think I'd rather not know what bank notes have by way of trace material on them, and I always wash my hands before touching food! If a dish of peanuts on a bar is full of (sh)it, imagine what gets onto bank notes...

Talking of food, the head honcho of Marie Claire wrote to a bistro boss and told him that he and some guests would very much like to dine at his restaurant. It had been chosen to be featured in 'Paris vu par... Jean-Paul Lubot', on condition that the meal was offered. Old JP was given short shrift by the manager who told him his request was 'louche et frauduleuse'. Magnificent words from a man whose bistro could have been bathing in the light of a thumbs-up review in a major magazine, but chose to stick two fingers up instead.

At the other end of the social scale, an association providing free meals for people in need was given a couple of wild boar weighing in at 30kg to add to the menu. These beasties had been rampaging through the centre of Chambery last week along with the rest of the family and were brought down before they wrought too much havoc. The association was offered eight beasties in total, but only accepted two because of the work needed to butcher them. They will be dealt with by retired butchers who on the previous Monday had sharpened their knives on a boar of 95kg! Bon appetit!

Unlikely to tuck into a meal of civet de sanglier however will be Muslim recipients of these dinners. Not only would they be horrified at the prospect, but they should also be concerned about the results of a new IFOP/Le Figaro survey. It shows a hardening of attitudes among the French towards Muslims - 43% of those questioned said that they thought Islam is a 'threat', due especially to an increase in the visibility of Islam in the media and in public. 67% think that Muslims don't integrate enough; 63% don't want to see veils and scarves in the street and 89% don't want to see them in schools. 69% believe that France has been extremely welcoming to Muslim immigrants but that they reject French values.

What this means is that despite years of having Islam rammed down our throats by a pc media, the French refuse to be lobotomised into accepting all the disinformation thrown at them. What will the government do with these results? Nothing, it will continue to ignore the rising frustration of the people, let ever more immigrants into the country and clamp down on dissent.

As it has done with Génération-identitaire, a group of essentially young adults under 30 from the extreme right, whose group is at present under threat of dissolution. They decided to occupy, peacefully, an unfinished mosque in Poitiers. A mosque which is supposed to be just a building site, the owners having run out of money, yet has in it prayer carpets... Four of the occupiers are accused of 'damaging a prayer carpet' and a judge is asking for a maximum prison sentence of 5 years!

France is a country where many of us love to live, but it's not all wine, baguettes and pretty countryside. There are a lot of very worrying and dodgy tendencies that are becoming increasingly widespread, and not just in France. Ignore them at your peril.